$500MM for Mozilla is, from my perspective, in the same league as a company making tens of billions with a much more diverse portfolio. $500MM is a ton of money, not "scrappy" in any sense.
-
-
Replying to @wycats @asadotzler and
I honestly think it's not about money at all it's about things like Google being the #1 search and advertising company. For a while they advertised Chrome on the search page, which was a position no one else could buy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TedMielczarek @wycats and
Also things like favoring / pushing Chrome in massive web properties like YouTube are basically priceless.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TedMielczarek @wycats and
Indeed. Also bundling Chrome with their Android OS and making it hard for OEMs to change kind of reminds me of another round of this from a couple decades ago.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @asadotzler @TedMielczarek and
And yet Firefox fought IE to a draw and then some with a tiny staff and no money. Times are different, and I don't want to romanticize the past, but I this perspective feels way to defeatist to me. Half a billion dollars a year gives you a lot of options.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @TedMielczarek and
It takes a huge team to implement today's increasingly complex web standards compared to back then. Real browsers have engines :P
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asadotzler @TedMielczarek and
UC is absolutely its own engine (it's a fork of webkit, but so is Blink, and I think you count Blink as a "real engine"). As a framework author, I wish it weren't so, but it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @TedMielczarek and
I don't consider all webkit forks the way I consider Google and Blink. Do you?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asadotzler @TedMielczarek and
It's a very old fork with extremely significant divergences, including a huge reliance on server processing. They're not just leeching off of Apple; not at all.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @asadotzler and
For what it’s worth, I think UC Browser is pretty different, because they would not be competitive at all if they weren’t targeting the Chinese market specifically (market share data confirms this).
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
FirefoxOS was ostensibly targeting the same market, no?
-
-
We targeted a number of markets with Firefox OS. India and Latin America and even Europe.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.