Yep. That's what I mean by not sure how much AMP interest is helping.
-
-
So we stalled getting to the thing you’re a true believer in because too many true believers paid attention to the thing that didn’t work out. Mind you, your thing hasn’t been deployed, but it’ll work out, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I took your bait politely and you slammed me for it. Too bad. Bundling is a tried and true technique on the web that is by far the dominant solution today for significant-sized apps. Paving that cowpath is better than building a new speculative rube Goldberg.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
The packaging group would do well to collaborate actively with developers instead of discounting their input as ideological. This would help avoid another H/2 push, and my experience on TC39 has been that engaging developers makes a huge difference in speeding up adoption.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @wycats and
Yep. Please let me know if it looks like I'm discounting any (non-crank) person's input without considering it adequately.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jyasskin @littlecalculist and
I think the main input I have not seen duly considered is on priorities. There is seemingly more interest in bundling from outside Google than the other bits.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @annevk @littlecalculist and
I've definitely heard more interest this week in bundling than signing, but I can't ignore the 689 people who signed a letter saying the opposite either. Both will get done.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jyasskin @littlecalculist and
http://ampletter.org/ does not ask for what you’re proposing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I didn't sign ampletter precisely because I didn't think it was asking for the right things. This is further evidence that I was right about that. I'd love to work with
@jyasskin and@annevk on bundling. I have a lot of experience on what works for ember I'd love to share.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
We should get an IETF mailing list shortly to centralize discussion. In the mean time, I'll fix
@annevk's comments on https://github.com/WICG/webpackage/pull/98 … and commit it tomorrow, after which it'll accept PRs. Is Mozilla committing to implement whatever bundling we all come up with?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I don't personally prefer to contribute to web standards at IETF and would prefer to do this work at WHATWG, which has a community process I can easily participate in. It seems weird to ask Mozilla for an up front commitment to "whatever we come up with"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.