-
-
Replying to @mnot
Perhaps, "shipped without evidence that it actually helped".
2 replies 6 retweets 33 likes -
-
Many times this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
There's quite a bit about the protocol that makes me feel this way, to be honest. It was rushed out the door far too quickly without enough real world validation.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
And in the interim, years of effort into things like web packaging were completely stalled because too many folks were true believers. There's a lesson here.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/generic-bundling#content-62 … basically halted the entire effort. Found via https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/commit/e5c1f60bce08f571b3da946560eeb3012776ab87 … which is somewhat amusing in hindsight.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
"And with HTTP 2.0 on near horizon, the limitation in number of requests is completely removed: we have full multiplexing, prioritization, flow control.. which is exactly where we want to go if we want to accelerate page load times."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(4 years ago, near horizon)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, I'm preaching to the choir. So sue me ;)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.