We're not talking about destroying the work of the people who were Told™. We're talking about destroying (the only copy of) the work of authors whose publishers (unwittingly, in many cases) used the wrong paper.https://twitter.com/brianmfitch/status/971770091665752064 …
-
-
That said, smoosh is not a good replacement name, and I would have objected to it if it was proposed seriously to the committee. The idea is somehow that by focusing on the costs of a change & the tools available to us, we're a bunch of unaccountable idiots holding the web back.
-
Instead, we're taking the costs of a breaking change seriously (at least momentarily) and surveying the options. And there hasn't even been another meeting yet! Just GitHub comments! The pitchforks are coming a bit early here.
-
Yeah, the reaction has been disappointing to say the least. While I've got you, what about `arr.flattened()`? That seems more appropriate anyway, given that it doesn't (if I understand correctly) mutate `arr`
-
I mean there's literally more noise about some discussion about what to do about a web compat issue than when TC39 momentarily recommended semicolon usage.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.