Dear JS world: @emberjs 3.0 was the deep breath before the plunge. Ember is going to be *moving* this year. I’m putting together my @EmberConf workshop with 3.1 beta, @typescriptlang, and decorators, and it’s a very, very different world.
A much better one.
Get ready.
-
-
Thank you for clearing this up. How about the documentation?
-
I think it's safe to assume the same for that. At this point, TypeScript isn't even *mentioned* in the docs. Even if it at some point TS is added to the docs as a first-class citizen— a big "?"— it would always be JS as the default. You'd *opt in* to seeing TS examples.
-
I see ember-cli-typescript having a "Using TypeScript in Ember.js" guide, much like
@chriskrycho's blog posts -
It's not impossible to imagine a TS mode in the docs (some day, maybe), but I'd really want to keep it out of the way of people using JS, and never ever rely on something in TS to make the examples conceptually work.
-
In other words, do the examples JS first, then fill in the TS stuff afterwards, not the other way around.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is it fair to compare emberjs to react or to angularjs?
-
In what sense?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I prefer Ember's approach. As opposed to Angular's absurd way of doing it TypeScript first, with standard ES as a secondary

-
Me too, Ember approach makes much more sense, learn Angular is difficult due also learn RxJS and Typescript.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks
@wycats let's this clear, it's a relief to know that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I presume that means: At least not until JS supports type annotations and their runtime reflection natively.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.