These comments in all places seem 90% rhetoric, 10% moment-in-time papers/analyses from years ago. I want the analysis without the rhetoric. Anything that spends words on "non standard crypto" and berating people for even considering it is not analysis.
I'm not saying the criticism is wrong. I'm saying that when people say "trust the experts on climate change" there's a million papers you can point to with detailed analysis. That's not true here, just repetition of the same rhetoric over and over.
-
-
Now I'm repeating myself :) I want to be clear: I have no idea if there's a problem here. I'm just asking for more information beyond the basic argument I've seen repeated over and over again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.