People who think telegram is doing dubious things with encryption and security: are there any good write-ups of the critiques that respond to https://core.telegram.org/techfaq ?
I'm definitely not dismissing security researchers. I could believe that there's some up-to-date place that responds to the Telegram arguments, but simply calling them "cranks" based on 2015-era research is not very interesting to me.
-
-
You are dismissing them imo. After working in security a while you learn to use heuristics to cut through things because 99.9% of what's out there is snake oil. The experts are convinced and satisfied. You're not? Well, either trust the experts, become one, or pay them! ;)
-
Security experts usually do more than yell at the top of their lungs once a product reaches hundreds of millions of users. I'm surprised that if their security is so bad, there aren't tons of script kiddie attacks on the internet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree on the crank part. Yet, I switched to Signal when it comes to secure conversation that I have, because it uses a proven framework for securing messages end-to-end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.