It's disconcerting to hear that some at TC39 are pushing back against decorators. @BrendanEich please tell me these rumors are unfounded nonsense. The major projects using decorators is endless, as is the pain of this feature being forever in limbo.
-
-
MobX, Angular, Glimmer. That should be enough to demonstrate how serious this feature is. There are also issues in the TypeScript repo begging for better typing support, but they're waiting on stage 3, too.
-
There's also very popular community decorators in both the react and ember communities. The Ember ones are maintained by core team members but we've been holding back on making them official to avoid relying on Stage 2 features. But that position is becoming untenable.
-
For reference, https://github.com/ember-decorators/ember-decorators/blob/master/README.md … The slow walk on decorators is also slowing down Ember adoption of JS classes (despite already landing core support), which is also increasingly untenable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ultimately committee members can object for any reason. This is more of a norms issue than a procedure issue imo. But as I said I'm happy to keep pushing the rock up the hill.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.