If only JavaScript proposals would be decided on http://uservoice.com or similar platform by entire community and not by vendors themselves...
-
-
It's called TC39. Plz join.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
First, individuals can't join, only companies whose interests lie there. Second, even if I could, it would be still a group of interested parties (aka vendors), just with one more added. Still not the community as a whole.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
I will when I get a chance. Is there an EZPZ way to track the schedule (IE: "next.tc39.meeting" or something like that? lol)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @wycats @TheLarkInn and
Will say have had a difficult time going to tc39 - have to represent some company, can't be an invited guest for more than like 2 times, otw we have to be in a foundation or a tc39 paying company? (and then have to pay to fly out unless it's local but also my issue)
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @left_pad @TheLarkInn and
Yeah this is definitely something worth reforming. First step is getting more representation outside of vendors. Next step is finding ways for people like you to attend. Per company membership fees are not the right structure.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I think we've done well on the first step. I don't mind stepping up pressure on reforming the membership structure now that we have so many web devs attending.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
When you’re done can you help fix the w3c membership too?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ugh. WHATWG is a better starting point.
/cc @annevk
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.