JavaScript code is much more expensive, byte for byte, than an image, because of the time spent parsing and compiling it. It's possible to parse and compile wasm as fast as it comes over the network, which makes it much more like an image than JavaScript code. Game changer!
-
-
$=Dollars, Money. Sorry! wasm ships in 68% of browsers, fallbacks to asmjs for the rest.. yet afaik, no company has shipped some core product with wasm.
-
Glimmer (the project I'm working on) is gonna ship wasm Q1 2018 if all goes well. It'll then be in Ember, which is in tons of products that make $. wasm->asm fallback has serious issues and is still our #1 blocker.
-
Great! I need to check your branch :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.