The replies to this tweet do a pretty good job of making Sam’s point.https://twitter.com/sama/status/941355543213498368 …
-
-
Replying to @startupandrew
It seems like the replies are a lot of people disagreeing. Very strongly. Are you saying if someone says something wrong people should hold back from disagreeing? And that holding back from disagreeing with something you disagree with is important for the spread of ideas?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
There’s a difference between thoughtful debate and branding someone a heretic. Many of the replies to Sam I’d categorize as personal attacks.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @startupandrew
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Yehuda Katz 🥨
Here's an example thread I wrote. https://twitter.com/wycats/status/941888353485537280 … Would you categorize it as a personal attack?
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
No, not a personal attack. But I also think you’re jumping to conclusions without really considering his ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @startupandrew @wycats
Remember his thesis is “maybe we should be more tolerant of disagreeable ideas”. Everyone seems to be latching on to his one sentence about disparaging gay folks, which i think Sam included for effect to show how seriously he takes this (sam is gay)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
To be clear, this is public information:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/10/sam-altmans-manifest-destiny …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yep.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.