Those require a superclass, though, no? And/or some weirdness around having to call a phantom super constructor method.
Still fixable because we can change throws into behavior, right?
-
-
Still fixable, broken going back to ES2015
-
We should fix. I think I missed us never finishing extends null.
-
Let's do this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.