I'm ready to call it: ES2015 modules are way more useful as an authoring format than as a browser runtime feature. Expect tools that "statically link" modules into one script/module to be best practice for a long time. But it's great that we standardized the authoring format!
-
-
Replying to @wycats
Possibly a dangerous thing to add as a runtime feature then, if it's going to encourage bad loading practices?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bluepnume
I think it's not bad for cases that approximate today's script tags, and I think a lot of small sites will use it this way (and benefit, big time). But I don't think we're gonna see sites with thousands of modules running natively any time soon.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
Replying to @wycats @bluepnume
And I also think that coming to terms with that is good for modules on the web.
6:43 PM - 17 Nov 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.