No. In fact we're actually realizing the way we used to ship code was egregiously slow, inaccessible, and no interoperable. Welcome to front end _Engineering_. https://twitter.com/ben_howdle/status/930012526628110337 …
-
-
No disagreement there. It's just so weird to me that there is no "here's how you build an app, here's how you test code, etc" from the big players.
-
What you're asking for is convention over configuration. Which is what we have with things like Django, rails, etc.
-
By a major company, yes.
-
Why does it need to be by a major company? We have stuff like Angular, Polymer, React. I'm happy stuff like Ember exists despite not being by a bigco.
-
Not to mention vital tooling and infrastructure like babel webpack lodash, blah blah, and fire catching like vue.
-
Not sure Babel's the best example for you here - the (heroic) maintainers are chronically under-funded and overworked. Its one of the best examples of why I think the OSS model is so profoundly broken and un-maintainable.
-
They are just getting started. Funding and partnerships and relationships take time.
@left_pad drove babel to a better position then it could ever be to continue to drive change and support for babel. -
And in the current broken system and old age where Bazar and legacy OSS support practice break down, the bottom line is: if you want your project funded, it's a shit ton of work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.