No. In fact we're actually realizing the way we used to ship code was egregiously slow, inaccessible, and no interoperable. Welcome to front end _Engineering_. https://twitter.com/ben_howdle/status/930012526628110337 …
-
-
Yeah they should go back to when server side was easy and you could just write assembly, 1s, 0s, and SigV, and just reload.......pic.twitter.com/PYCQS8ZZrZ
-
Omg that thread is painful
-
Back in the good old days the C++ developers pushed bits uphill both ways. You kids with your 20k of libraries and fancy pants compilers have it so easy. Yawn.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps JS binary formats could get us part of the way there? JS files are massive for how little actual text is inside.
-
WebAssembly. You're describing WebAssembly.
-
WASM doesn’t have DOM access. But maybe eventually
-
Glimmer does ;)
-
Glimmer's architecture is an amazing fit for wasm. I had a great chat with Luke Wagner (wasm team) about how to structure our memory management and our current structure is almost a perfect fit for today's wasm. Follow this branch! I'm so excited! https://github.com/glimmerjs/glimmer-vm/commits/u32-stack …
-
It will eventually with the JS bindings proposal underway.
-
What will?
-
I think Sean means WASM will eventually have DOM access.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

