The consequence is that projects that are more honest about their status get rejected for projects whose maintainers are enthusiastic.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Thinking about this because I'm trying to decide how to talk about a new project I'm working on open sourcing, extracted from a real app.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think we need to distinguish between “open source software” and “hosted on GitHub/any public place” :).
-
I use the term "source available" for the latter.
-
“source available” is omakase :D
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you produce a first good definition of what is production ready then I hereby propose to call all confirming software Katz-complete.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I had seen a team defining the readiness level via multiple parameters. Something like this (not an accurate one, I saw it almost a decade ago, but the idea is on those lines!)pic.twitter.com/K6991VNYog
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SHIP IT!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.