Or, you know, ability to build a Saturn V and go to the moon (using slide rules & early computers)? I trust in @elonmusk but not there yet.
-
-
(You did say “movement conservatism” - thanks for excluding me btw)
-
I meant to say I didn't mean that they *were* movement cons, but rather too many strangely aligned with those.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
instead got classic movement cons policies like big tax cuts, reduction in middle class safety net.
-
You are jumping all over! But note Trump was not movement con, ever. More vote against elites, like Sanders. Possible traitor to his class.
-
That was the trap. People thought he would be different. Instead, he enables warmed over 2016 Ryan policies. ...
-
Lol, Trump hates Ryan. The secret sauce you seek is “oligarchy”. Both serve common set of super rich extended families, which form factions.
-
Thomas Frank argues Rust belt voters have false consciousness, after Marx. I think some saw thru phony front runners & took chances on T&S.
-
Why I voted for Sanders in CA.
-
Are you a registered dem? Don't you have to be dem to vote in their primaries?
-
No (Independent), and not in CA if party allows (Ds allowed Is to vote in 2016 primary; Rs did not, sooprise sooprise sooprise!).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump was elected at the end of 2016, so voters had yet to use the new MBP keyboard for even a year. obvious recency bias
-
Exactly! Too soon.
-
We'll see! Either way, too easily duped. I would vote for Ted Cruz over Harvey Weinstein.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
