Because "you can use a static login page" has nothing to do with "punishment" and the idea that it's specific to React is spin ;)
-
-
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
Every single framework, including "heavyweight" Ember, "allows" you to use a static login page and doesn't "punish you for doing so.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wycats @BrendanEich and
Yet so few do it. And parts of the React community got pretty angry when Netflix did it.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @wycats and
It probably was the clickbait-y title that triggered the anger. I doubt people read beyond the headline that React is still being used
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayonlines @jaffathecake and
I don't think the fact that React was used on the server is particularly relevant, although it can help reduce some angst perhaps.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @jaffathecake and
it is extremely relevant! I use angular (you could use any f/w) even for static-ish SSRed pages/sites because I can use the same
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayonlines @wycats and
mental model to build any web app - classic or SPA. The point is that I'm using a framework for what it's supposed to do -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayonlines @wycats and
make development fun & fast. And today's frameworks (all of them) actually allow you to get the best of both worlds.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayonlines @wycats and
That's why I think that the clickbaity title actually does a disservice to the underlying principle that should come out from that article
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayonlines @wycats and
aww, I tried to avoid being clickbaity. It could have been "Netflix removes React, gets faster. Where now for React??"
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think your title was fine :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.