Still, if Bob was so good at everything he does, why would he get moved in the first place?pic.twitter.com/FqGTNZckZn
-
-
Every single framework, including "heavyweight" Ember, "allows" you to use a static login page and doesn't "punish you for doing so.
-
Yet so few do it. And parts of the React community got pretty angry when Netflix did it.
-
I guess I'm weirded out by this, since
@skylight has been doing it from the beginning. Allows us to have "go to your apps" on marketing site -
I too was confused, hence the article
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Jake wrote "React doesn't punish you for doing some stuff without React". I didn't see an attack on Ember. Was it a strawman? Not in '80s!
-
He said it "reflects well on React", which implies relative to something else.
-
That was in response to the React fans that were angry. I was saying "no, this should be celebrated"
-
I think at this point we're in violent agreement. The whole framing of this thing across the board is very bizarre to me, but I get it :)
-
It's not bizarre in view of what Netflix said in their talk, plus that title. Rehydration etc. came late, people can & do still overuse JS.
-
What's bizarre is talking about the login page as if it's particularly representative of other use-cases.
-
My interpretation: React is small and maximally flexible, which allows people to consider novel use cases like server-only templating layer.
-
Good interpretation. Glad we exposed a flexible primitive in Ember (visit()) so FastBoot is possible ;)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.