I am assuming every project with specific terms for this a. got a lawyer b. you can't reuse the terms
-
-
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
like I would need to define some equivalent to "bison skeleton" for my project
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
which does not in fact exist; the generated parsers contain fragments of canopy source code throughout
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
I hate that this is even a thing, it makes no sense
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
The entire GPL make no sense. What does it mean to "link" Ruby code? You deliberately chose a confusing license to annoy ppl ;)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
dude, if you're playing gotcha with licenses, choose an example where it doesn't make the interpretation easier
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @wycats
It doesn't mean anything to link with a ruby program because it doesn't have to. The GPL is only concerned with combining
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielMorsing
Then why do people use GPL for libraries written in dynamic languages (like, a lot)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats
Because they care about free software and they want people who receive the software to retain those rights?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I don't think this Twitter conversation is gonna say anything that hasn't already been said. Probably best to defer to existing writings
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.