like I would need to define some equivalent to "bison skeleton" for my project
-
-
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
which does not in fact exist; the generated parsers contain fragments of canopy source code throughout
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
I hate that this is even a thing, it makes no sense
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts
You can also deliberately state that the output from canopy does not constitute a covered workpic.twitter.com/86CPz6iLuO
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielMorsing
I cannot even parse what "given its content" might mean
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts
t's meant for things that include "significant" parts of the covered work. It's a safeguard against people stripping GPL with quines
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielMorsing
this is a great example of why this whole thing is philosophically intractable
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @DanielMorsing
Law isn’t philosophy, though. Maybe the employer who’s squicky about GPL can have their lawyer help write what you want written?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @izs @DanielMorsing
how do I have someone come up with a custom license, that's not acting on my behalf, and whom I'm not paying, without getting screwed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
i don't think you want a custom license, just a clarification in the readme.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What you want is to not have used the GPL.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.