Won't get into weeds on hasty metaphor, I'll just leave it at people aren't wrong for desiring features that are merely "nice-to-have".
Dynamic languages and typed langs w/ advanced features can get away with building different kinds of frameworks.
-
-
People are productive in bash but don't really write frameworks in it. Go abstractions tend to be shallower.
-
This is a fine sweet spot to be in, especially for small services and CLI tools, which tend to be more concrete, closer to scripting.
-
I'd even agree that the computing ecosystem could use a recalibration in this direction. But the silver-bulletness is unwarranted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.