Do you want mixin syntax in JS, and if so, which semantics? In the prototype chain means super works.
-
-
Hmmm sounds like Interfaces would be more genericly useful then & we don’t need Mixins for that. Count me as “don’t need” I guess.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so the base class would provide the equivalent of `.each` and `<=>`, and the mixin provides all the enumerable implementations?
-
(s/implementations/methods/) I guess that makes sense, but I wonder if we should prefer bind / pipeline for that sort of thing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.