To me, "serverless" is about moving the framework into the platform. "Hosted Rails controllers" would look a lot like serverless.
-
-
I think a lot of it has to do with cost and only paying for the compute you use.
-
From my experience I don't feel like I have saved much on development or received an improved DX ... but maybe it's too new
-
Are the server savings a dominant source of cost for your application?
-
We're trying this model for two reasons: - quicker scaling based on demand - server utilization We haven't gone to production yet so...
-
I can't speak on actual savings. Only DX so far
-
Right...I can't speak about impact to server cost yet. But DX and time spent in development were not improved
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.