So I'm no fan of whiny prescriptivism language complainers, but "serverless" really takes the cake for a pointlessly confusing neologism.
-
-
That you don't have to worry about or administer the servers. (Yes, it's technically incorrect. But I instantly knew what it meant the 1/
-
first time I heard it, and I haven't heard any other term that I think is better.) 2/2
-
Why did this feel new and different compared to Heroku? Or would you call Heroku serverless too?
-
Not saying serverless is a perfect term, and I would welcome a better one. But I think the snark about it is tiresome.
-
I'm mostly trying to figure out what is different about it vs Heroku (there are things!) and the name obscures more than it helps.
-
FaaS is better, I think.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.