There is "return to previous AdWords" option. As I see it, teams should have the right to release features to different browsers gradually
In the WHATWG process, it does mean that. In other processes, not aways.
-
-
[citation needed], not true at all? Please quote me part of https://whatwg.org/working-mode that you think supports this?
-
I don't want to argue with you on Twitter, per (quite reasonable) request.
-
Charitably, I think I'm saying something non-controversial (tell me if I'm wrong): in the WHATWG process, "doing the work" is highly valued.
-
I think it's very reasonable to dislike working modes where power is *not* correlated with doing work!
-
I appreciate the clarification. I don't agree with the leap from "valued" to "having more power", but am happy to leave it for now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Other browser vendors squash Chrome ideas all the time. I'm not seeing more power.
-
You're not seeing more power? You don't think Google has more power than Mozilla? Really?
-
I haven't seen them wield it when Mozilla reps are against a spec. And def no more power than Apple.
-
This is just wrong. I doubt most Googlers would disagree.
-
What is wrong, the vague notion of "power" or that Apple and Mozilla have prevented Google ideas from being implemented?
-
"Power" is not a vague notion. Google has more active people working on standards, a shitton more money, and way more users.
-
They obviously have more power. That isn't evil, but it's just true. I'm not sure why it's important for you to deny.
-
Google the company of course. EME etc. Chrome team though, I don't see. Little old Mozilla killed html imports.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
2. Chrome dominates WHATWG so doesn't make sense to differentiate.
