what if it's `.m.js` instead ? https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/issues/57#issuecomment-336254657 … • ecosystem ready-to-go via a .js extension • no magic needed, always loaded as ESMpic.twitter.com/rOFzOKgUIm
-
Show this thread
-
PR landed If you care about the future of ESM and you don't' like .mjs, please like this 1 liner change full of winshttps://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16170 …
2 replies 4 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
wondering what
@littlecalculist,@wycats and@caridy think about this1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
I've suggested .m.js before but it was rejected :(
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
too bad I couldn't find discussions about it. Is the discussion or the reason anywhere online? thanks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't remember. Nor do I remember if I was persuaded :p
6:08 PM - 12 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.