1: You know how people think the Ruby stdlib convention of `!` for mutation conflicts with the Rails convention of `!` for exceptions?
Part of the issue is that the abstract description doesn't really match the implementation of common monads like state.
-
-
How does it not match?
-
You have to think very abstractly about monadic values being functions. It's now how the basic description of monads implies it would work.
-
For clarity: I don't need you to teach me how the state Monad works ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
http://emorehouse.web.wesleyan.edu/silliness/burrito_monads.pdf … is now my go-to monad paper seriously, while it's a joke, i think it's great
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.