Hmm... @Oculus #Rift #opensource #VR dev kit released under 'BSD+ PATENT' license:
https://developer.oculus.com/blog/open-source-release-of-rift-dk2/ …
Twitter outcry in 5...4...
pic.twitter.com/vO7vhSLCKI
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If I came up with an idea as a junior dev working on jQuery in 2006, it seems inappropriate for someone to patent equiv claims in 2007-8
Agree. Patents are *presumed* valid but only finite resources available for examination and always possible something is missed...
... But unless you are being threatened with this patent, how does its existence affect you?
The existence of such a huge amount of bogus patents affects the environment I do my work in.
If you make meaningful decisions based solely on the *existence* of patent you can prove is "bogus" I'm not sure you're getting good advice
I just pray that I don't get ensnared. There's not much else for me to do.
A truly "bogus" patent should be easy to invalidate with prior art. If no prior art, patent is valid/legitimate.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.