I still don't get why not to use const for everything unless you explicitly need to rebind the name for some reason.
You can tell if local bindings are mutated by reading the code. If it's hard, your functions are too big. What you can't get back ...
-
-
is the original author's INTENT, which is far far more valuable. Use const to mean "you shouldn't change this to let"
-
const-until-you-mutate devalues const. It makes switching to let mindless. I won't turn ppl into FP programmers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.