Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
wycats's profile
Yehuda Katz 🥨
Yehuda Katz 🥨
Yehuda Katz  🥨
Verified account
@wycats

Tweets

Yehuda Katz  🥨Verified account

@wycats

Tilde Co-Founder, OSS enthusiast and world traveler.

Portland, OR
yehudakatz.com
Joined August 2007

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Ryan Florence‏ @ryanflorence 21 Sep 2017

      Saying inline functions in render is bad is like correcting somebody who said "who" to say "whom" when "who" was actually correct.

      11 replies 15 retweets 92 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 21 Sep 2017
      Replying to @ryanflorence

      As a person not in the react ecosystem, I don't understand this at all. Like, at all. Can you explain?

      2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
    3. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 21 Sep 2017
      Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence

      Not trolling in any way. Really confused and interested.

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    4. Joey Trapp‏ @joeytrapp 21 Sep 2017
      Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence

      I think the ember equivalent would be https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.15.0/components/block-params/ …. Rather than child nodes, you component gets a fn to call with args

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
      Replying to @joeytrapp @ryanflorence

      There's no direct equivalent of ^ in React, because no this.props.children(args)

      5:08 AM - 22 Sep 2017
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Joey Trapp‏ @joeytrapp 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence

          No, not a direct equivalent, but I think the purpose of render functions it to achieve the a similar end results

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @joeytrapp @ryanflorence

          Isn't it mostly used for callbacks a la ember actions?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Ryan Florence‏ @ryanflorence 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @joeytrapp

          I've got a write up coming, but yeah, it's usually click handler type things that aren't even relevant to rendering.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        5. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @ryanflorence @joeytrapp

          Seems fine to inline simple ones, especially () => this.something(something)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        6. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @ryanflorence @joeytrapp

          Even Ember, which on balance has less logic in our render() (templates) than react has an inline action thing.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        7. Ryan Florence‏ @ryanflorence 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @joeytrapp

          modern ember probably different, but I struggled to keep required referential model identity. People are opting into that and don't need to.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @ryanflorence @joeytrapp

          What does "referential model identity" mean?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Ryan Florence‏ @ryanflorence 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @joeytrapp

          if my model wasn't the exact same object between updates, things went nuts.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        10. 7 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Michiel Dral‏ @dralletje 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @joeytrapp @ryanflorence

          `this.props.children(args)` is exactly what a lot of us are doing in React now, “func-as-child”

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @dralletje @joeytrapp @ryanflorence

          Can you show me what that looks like on the caller side?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @dralletje and

          <Foo children={func} /> or something more clever?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Brandon Dail‏ @aweary 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @dralletje and

          You can just pass the function inline as the childpic.twitter.com/DtP5Y4xbey

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        6. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @aweary @dralletje and

          And if there's only one child this.props.children is the child? Or this.props.children[0]?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Brandon Dail‏ @aweary 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @wycats @dralletje and

          Right, a single child would be available as this.props.children. You can use React.Children.only to ensure you only have a single child too

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Yehuda Katz  🥨‏Verified account @wycats 22 Sep 2017
          Replying to @aweary @dralletje and

          Wouldn't it be more convenient to have direct syntax for this in JSX?

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. 10 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info