Stop putting onus on activists to make up for W3C's failure. If we have to do this (cf. http://WHATWG.org in 2004) why do we need W3C?
-
-
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
There is no Web police. It’s not that the onus is on activists — it’s on everyone who cares.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robinberjon @wycats and
Then why does the Director have authority to resolve conflicts? You can't have it both ways. TBL rejected EFF's proposal. He's on the hook.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
Ok, and what happens next? Say, in the wake of that decision Apple leaves. EME goes to a separate consortium, without IPR. Is it a win?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robinberjon @wycats and
Who would leave over the EFF-proposed covenant? I'd like to know but secret vote is secret, doesn't tell who would actually leave over it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @robinberjon and
But yes, in extremis, it's far better for W3C to uphold the Open Web principles that it is founded upon, than to violate those principles.
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich @wycats and
So win morally but die as an organisation? Maybe. Again, I’m not sure there is a win in there.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robinberjon @BrendanEich and
Failing to give its imprimatur to DRM tech would kill W3C as an org? That's a strong assertion.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins @robinberjon and
It sounds like a claim based on some backroom information (threats by browsers, content producers?). Should have been made in public.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @wycats @tabatkins and
Just assume rationality: what would cause an org that has fended off DRM for ages to agree to a form of compromise?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Director has been trying to approve vanilla DRM for ages, based on faulty "compromise with oneself" analysis. EFF just forced the issue.
-
-
Replying to @wycats @robinberjon and
But you're not answering the question: what makes us *100% sure* that approving the compromise would have resulted in browsers bolting?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.