Are you trolling now? We have no leverage. W3C had it and failed, up to the Director, to use it. What leverage now, harsh language?
-
-
I would expect many companies to object to a legally binding document they don't perceive as vital to them. It's asking for exposure...
-
...in exchange for a public good they don't feel strongly about. That alone could almost derail it. Add browser vendors and it's dead.
-
This is a far too fatalistic point of view and removes the agency of the Director, excusing him for his behavior.
-
1: We'll never know if your game theory is right because we were too cowardly to try.
-
2: if the browser vendors and content producers actually maintained a long term blockade against EFF-included EME, your argument ...
-
3/3: would hold water. It's hardly an argument for the Director to compromise with ourselves and capitulate ahead of time.
-
But it sounds like you're backing up what I said earlier: W3C management, and especially TBL, have long believed capitulation inevitable.
-
It's not like he's been coy about it either. https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2091d4/i_am_tim_bernerslee_i_invented_the_www_25_years/cg0y6o4/ …
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can't give you that, it happened more recently. I can speculate though. The MPAA bogeyman theories don't hold water, IMHO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.