This description of React's patent situation by an actual patent lawyer sums up my understanding nicely:https://blog.cloudboost.io/3-points-to-consider-before-migrating-away-from-react-because-of-facebooks-bsd-patent-license-b4a32562d268 …
-
-
Well, I am an actual patent lawyer (been called worse...
) but anyone citing my article as "legal advice" probably didn't read it:pic.twitter.com/H8upJRrGPK
-
"don't worry about it" is definitely advice when made citing your article. No?
-
Dunno. I think tone of the article is clear that it's raising issues ("3 Points to Consider...") not advising X or Y.
-
A few things: 1. It's definitely being cited as legal advice. 2. Your tweets have gone further.https://twitter.com/ArielR_IP/status/909483656477134849 …
-
Someone else on Twitter citing to my article as "advice" != my (legal) advice, especially when article is explicit on this point throughout
-
Yehuda, I really don't understand why are you haranguing this man over other people ignoring his very clear disclaimers.
-
Yikes! I felt like we were having a good (long) back and forth over a few days. I certainly didn't mean to harangue him!
-
Thx, Laurie! No worries at all, Yehuda. Just good, spirited debate
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.