This has gotten too meta. Since you can edit things locally before pushing them, the idea that git is an unvarnished primary source is weird
Yeah this is what I was getting at. I push a lot of WIP just to get it off my local machine and into someplace durable.
-
-
People talk about WIP as if it can't be intentional. That's also something I'm confused by.
-
Sure it's not done, but it was still intentional when I wrote it. And if it wasn't, that usually also means I'm okay losing it.
-
To me commit messages provide archeology for future devs. Providing a concise narrative is more important than "wip: hope this fixes ci!"
-
Totally. Promoting good commit messages is way more valuable than arguing about merge vs rebase.
-
I always hope knowing the value of good commit history should be a motivator for more intentional commit discipline in the first place.
-
Hasn't been the case so far. `commit -a` is an institution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.