Yes, again, I agree. But up to this point you're the first person who has expressed any concern for the contributors. That's not the issue.
-
-
2: subject to revocation if a user sues *anyone* using the OSS for patent infringement. It is important that it covers all of the patents,
-
3: because its goal is to protect *users*. In contrast, the Facebook license is about protecting *Facebook*, so it protects
-
4: lawsuits against *any* Facebook patent (related or otherwise) and *no* patents from other contribs.
-
5/5: it's not a technical difference. It's a difference of goal.
-
, helps me understand. Clarifying q: if FB deleted PATENTS tomorrow, do you agree FB would have strictly more legal rights than today?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.