(except for Ember
- somehow you all manage to build a first-rate framework without corporate ownership 
)
Being overt with PATENTS is in many ways worse. Unilateral licensing terms in OSS is bad news.
-
-
For example Android uses Apache. I'd have to do work to compile a list.
-
What about Angular, Polymer, TypeScript?
-
TypeScript is Apache. Polymer and Angular are MIT. None have any unilateral clauses in their licenses.
-
I'd certainly be open to a campaign to encourage more frameworks to do Apache over MIT. But overt unilateral terms are something else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wish the specific, object effects of this, vs what exists with other big co's (G, MS, etc) was explored and better articulated.
-
I'm much less interested in surmising who thought about what & what's "better for OSS" than how this affects us *compared to alternatives*
-
One alternative is being less blase about becoming dependent on BigCo software, especially projects that double down on unilateral decisions
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.