(except for Ember
- somehow you all manage to build a first-rate framework without corporate ownership 
)
-
-
Replying to @AdamRackis @dan_abramov
Ember, Rails, Postgres, Rust, jQuery
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A lead corporation doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a broad group of contributors per your original tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's more about where the decision power comes from. Can you imagine a Rust RFC that added PATENTS to rust?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @dan_abramov
True also for Vue. From what I understand though React's is LESS dangerous than anything else from a major corp like Google or MS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'd be fine if framed as big corps vs independent devs ie Vue or Ember. But you were using React's uniqueness as de facto evidence of guilt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis @dan_abramov
PATENTS is a uniquely bad patent license.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @dan_abramov
What license does Google and MS attach to their frameworks, to protect us from *their* patent arsenals?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis @dan_abramov
Seriously casting this as a benevolent act by Facebook is silly and I wish you'd stop doing it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Lots of people use Apache when this issue comes up. Projects that use MIT w/o patent grant often haven't thought about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But FB is unique in having given it a great deal of thought and deciding to use a unilateral patent grant that singles out one contributor
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.