I'm seeing a lot of "but X other company also has patents." Yes, that's the broken system but the unique issue is the unusual license
-
-
What license does Google and MS attach to their frameworks, to protect us from *their* patent arsenals?
-
Seriously casting this as a benevolent act by Facebook is silly and I wish you'd stop doing it.
-
Lots of people use Apache when this issue comes up. Projects that use MIT w/o patent grant often haven't thought about it.
-
But FB is unique in having given it a great deal of thought and deciding to use a unilateral patent grant that singles out one contributor
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
- somehow you all manage to build a first-rate framework without corporate ownership 
)