Yes! Which is exactly why the patent grant protects *you* from getting sued by FB first.
-
-
And that, therefore, applying pressure to attempt to avoid PATENTS in the future (and remove existing ones) could work.
-
Or that FB legal has made a determination some packages must have the clause others should not, based on a reasoning that is not shared.
-
That could be possible. Alternatively, it could also be possible that team member preference and pressure plays a role.
-
I think I remember
@sebmck tweeting that he advocated strongly to get yarn published without patents, but memory may be failing me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.