The outcomes speak for themselves.
-
-
-
Replying to @domenic @bradleymeck and
I'd welcome an actual debate in public about the claim that TC39's outcomes are embarrassing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
That anyone could have less-than-positive views on TC39's outcomes is astonishing to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis @wycats and
TC39 seems unique among standards orgs in consistently producing useful, practical, intelligently-designed results.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis @wycats and
That Node and others are not trying to reproduce this is surprising to me, to say the least.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdamRackis @wycats and
I would say that Node has different values than what I see in this, but certainly has been changing. Multiple things have been revisited
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @AdamRackis and
A lot of this seems odd to me since various votes get overturned which seems out of scope of voting from my brief reads of pdfs here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @AdamRackis and
If votes are final that means a new vote cannot bring up old topics which is not true
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck @AdamRackis and
Also odd that I seem to get the feeling that abstaining is somehow being overlooked as a good thing on topics that one might not be comfy in
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The biggest difference is that taking another pass when a small minority opposes often improves designs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.