I'm not saying anything. I think you are focussing on the problems of tomorrow. Which is what I look for in the core team. But I think 1/
-
-
Replying to @oligriffiths @wycats and
That some people are looking for more guidance and leadership in non-technical areas, advocacy for ideas. Does that make sense? 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oligriffiths @tarasm and
Taras was criticizing my advocacy over the past few years vs ~2013. Curious what he perceives changed?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wycats @oligriffiths and
But ember community is extremely inwardly focused. 3 years after Ember 1 were essentially: we'll make awesome stuff and others will notice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tarasm @oligriffiths and
I don't think that's exactly right, but you're also not wrong. I think we got tired of being made fun of constantly.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The Ember community withdrew from HN, afaict, because of extreme hostility.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
There are people in the JS community willing to throw all of their effort into trolling anything that looks like a "monolithic" solution
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wycats @oligriffiths and
Response should be, you have to chose the right tool for the job, E was never not monolithic but need to tell people when this is good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tarasm @oligriffiths and
People think "why should I use a niche tool when react works well for both small and big cases"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Articles claiming ember is "disqualified for mobile" make people think "why should I use this tool for a desktop app if it's just for that"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
React is a "new paradigm for engineering" - seems more worth investing in, they think.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.