... and lose placement in the search carousel?
-
-
Proprietary? The AMP components are open. You could PR your own. I know what you mean tho, their team decides what gets in and what doesn't.
-
It's "open" by name only But effectively it's completely closed/proprietary And completely controlled by Google
-
There's really no point in arguing it's "openness" when it's not open at all (governed by anyone other than Google)
-
Openness is not binary. But yes, Google is the driving force and pays the engineers of the AMP project.
-
again. No point in arguing reality and facts. It's [effectively] closed and proprietary Arguing it's open is arguing for alternate facts
-
Apache license, go fork it, look at source... Can't do that with FBIA or Apple News. I'd still say AMP is more open than those. Fact.
-
What Are you missing? Seriously? FBIA and Apple have never mislead ANYONE about being open. They've made it crystal clear it's closed
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.