No. The data can be good and still be a deeply bad priority. That's my point.
-
-
-
Replying to @chriseppstein @littlecalculist
In practice, almost all data used as an input to "follow the data" is bad data by this definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The data cannot fail you. Only you fail the data.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Honestly, I've seen more mistakes from people following the data than people who interview bunches of users and go by intuition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chriseppstein @littlecalculist
But not measured. At this point you're just defining "data" broadly enough so that our agreement is tautological.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wycats @littlecalculist
I mean, I'd usually follow qualitative data up with quantitative data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But the ultimate metric of performance is a user's opinion. If that's not the best data I don't know what is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There was a movement in medicine to ask "users" (patients) their opinion. Higher satisfaction correlated to *worse* health outcomes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Aren't there also studies that unhappiness is correlated with poor long-term health outcomes?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.