Like is this meant to be more like Backbone, where you had a compiled template hidden away that was a render impl detail?
-
-
Correct, everything here is compiled away. Why do we need JS API's to do this? Why cant these instructions be interpreted from this file.pic.twitter.com/H3uZWZcMzb
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLarkInn @tbranyen and
In current userland this still has to compile down to
#JavaScript, which is okay because it is pretty damn efficienthttps://vuejs.org/v2/guide/reactivity.html …2 replies 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLarkInn @rchrdnsh and
I think there are two camps of thought on this, and non-hierarchical rendering doesn't seem to line up with React-thought.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Those are less important details to me. Important ones: * No need for JS APIs to update DOM. Everything else shown to me needs js. Cost
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLarkInn @rchrdnsh and
You see cost, I see an API people absolutely love to use. We want a render function in our ES classes, and you aren't taking that away!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not saying we can't have it. Heck maybe this specs implementation causes browsers to create one. Point is this: You don't _need_ js.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheLarkInn @rchrdnsh and
Wait a minute... isn't webpack written in JS? What kind of fast one are you trying to pull?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sure webpack bundles js, but as you may know it will not be the only first class citizen forever. Bundled ESM, WASM, CSS, is part of our fut
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheLarkInn @rchrdnsh and
I was just making a joke i think with all the discussion that got missed :-p
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
CUTENESS BREAKpic.twitter.com/ef50M9qdYP
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.