As a full time web developer who participates in standards too I can categorically say that this is false.
-
-
My favorite is when they say "no influence on search rankings" ... except a carousel above all the top search results.
-
- the carousel doesn't always rank at 1 - the carousel is news specific (small subset of AMP pages, most aren't eligible)
-
Yes, it does provide screen real estate, but also features that cannot be achieved without AMP such as fast swiping between results.
-
But you earlier said that there's no point in standardizing AMP because the primitives already exist. This is a counterexample.
-
https://twitter.com/cramforce/status/900794363172724736 … The deep coupling between Google Search and AMP is allowing you to miss obvious missing primitives in good faith.
-
The process is under way. I'm not sure it will yield something that people want, but I'm hopeful.
-
The process is under way in public? Or internal to Google?
-
Feature policy is the direct outcome of the work. Trying to push for stateless prefetch.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
4/4 as long as Google continues juicing AMP, AMP is on steroids. Its popularity only proves that Google search is cheating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.