AMP has a GitHub first contribution model. All you need is a GH account. No memberships or official mandate required.
-
-
That's all fine. But unlike standards, non-Googlers have had no say in whether the entire project exists, high-level vision, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @littlecalculist @cramforce and
What if every browser vendor just started creating its own "standards" and shipping them? "Everyone can participate" but...
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
This is all theoretical. In reality it is drastically easier to participate in & influence AMP as a web dev than it is for web standards.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
As a full time web developer who participates in standards too I can categorically say that this is false.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @wycats @cramforce and
Web standards processes give leverage to participants, implementor or not. This is a source of frustration for some implementors.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
You are a laudable exception. For now AMP has 3x the GH contributors to HTML.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My problem is not really the governance and contribution model. I don't want to contribute to AMP because I don't want it to exist.
5 replies 4 retweets 66 likes -
Replying to @seldo @cramforce and
I would like to not see AMP links in search results anymore. I think they're a bad idea. How can I constructively make my voice heard?
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
The AMP project will tell you



this is a google issue not an AMP issue.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Yehuda Katz 🥨 Retweeted Malte Ubl, Immigrant
Boom. https://twitter.com/cramforce/status/900751617187749888 … This is the shell game. Google makes amp, bakes it into search engine, but declares search convo out of scope
Yehuda Katz 🥨 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.