Apple thinks really carefully about adding features to its operating system, so imagine how many senior people must hate AMP to do this.
-
-
Replying to @seldo
I personally asked for this feature. I have also asked all other browser vendors, of course.
2 replies 7 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @cramforce @seldo
No, our policy is that AMP platforms should share the canonical URL when technically possible.
3 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @cramforce @seldo
This makes it technically possible. I’m advocating for a more general solution, but I’ll take the hack for now :)
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @cramforce
You know I have all the respect in the world for you personally, but I continue to think AMP is un-weblike and a bad idea.
4 replies 1 retweet 57 likes -
Replying to @seldo @cramforce
Persuading all browsers in the world to adapt to a format a single company invented and maintains for its own benefit is like 1990s Msft.
2 replies 1 retweet 47 likes -
Replying to @seldo
How is that happening? AMP renders in every browser. My proposal was to allow customizing share URLs. Generally useful.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cramforce @seldo
The issue is that the spec of supported web components is maintained and decided almost exclusively by Google.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Ryosuke and others at Apple contributed a lot to custom elements and helped shape the class based version
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kennethrohde @wycats and
He's referring to AMP web components, not web components in general.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.