Apple thinks really carefully about adding features to its operating system, so imagine how many senior people must hate AMP to do this.
-
-
It is a key distinction from tech like WAP.
-
But it's not a key distinction from 90s MSFT, which for example openwashed OOXML.
-
Bottom line is that I think it's reasonable to believe that the current structure is not a good fit for a web standard.
-
It's also reasonable to believe that the reason for AMP's nominal success is anticompetitive use of Google's search dominance.
-
I definitely feel like Google is cramming this down my throat, but "anticompetitive" implies competition to solve whatever it is AMP solves.
-
What I mean is that Google search is a monopoly, and they're abusing the monopoly to force publishers to use it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Random internet people are interested in who makes the spec for "the web". You've found a hack where the answer is "Google"
-
Random internet people are allowed to have a problem with that and reject this response to the critique.https://twitter.com/cramforce/status/900555298397487104 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.