A lot of Go criticism reduces to equally valid criticisms of Python, but it’s not fashionable to criticize Python.
-
-
Replying to @tqbf
It's really too bad it's not fashionable to criticize Python. Python as default language is unfortunate.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
It's also too bad it's *so* fashionable to criticize Ruby. Something in between for both would be great.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
What is wrong with ruby, language of and for the gods
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's literally optimized for programmer happiness!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CodeForCashBook @wycats
If debugging nil references 48 hours after you deploy something to prod makes you happy, mazel tov.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @tqbf @CodeForCashBook
See! It's plenty fashionable to criticize Ruby!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
To your point, Go is the only new major language in years that propagated the nil mistake ;)
-
-
You could add Elixir but to an extent that's to preserve the semantics of the BEAM. It's my only real gripe with it.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.